Free Window Blind Case Review
Fill out the form below, including all contact information and as much detail as possible about your case, and one of our window blind injury attorneys will contact you immediately.
Alabama Blind Cord Attorneys
Alaska Blind Cord Attorneys
Arizona Blind Cord Attorneys
Arkansas Blind Cord Attorneys
California Blind Cord Attorneys
Colorado Blind Cord Attorneys
Connecticut Blind Cord Attorneys
Delaware Blind Cord Attorneys
Florida Blind Cord Attorneys
Georgia Blind Cord Attorneys
Hawaii Blind Cord Attorneys
Idaho Blind Cord Attorneys
Illinois Blind Cord Attorneys
Indiana Blind Cord Attorneys
Iowa Blind Cord Attorneys
Kansas Blind Cord Attorneys
Kentucky Blind Cord Attorneys
Louisiana Blind Cord Attorneys
Maine Blind Cord Attorneys
Maryland Blind Cord Attorneys
Massachusetts Blind Cord Attorneys
Michigan Blind Cord Attorneys
Minnesota Blind Cord Attorneys
Mississippi Blind Cord Attorneys
Missouri Blind Cord Attorneys
Montana Blind Cord Attorneys
Nebraska Blind Cord Attorneys
Nevada Blind Cord Attorneys
New Hampshire Blind Cord Attorneys
New Jersey Blind Cord Attorneys
New Mexico Blind Cord Attorneys
New York Blind Cord Attorneys
North Carolina Blind Cord Attorneys
North Dakota Blind Cord Attorneys
Ohio Blind Cord Attorneys
Oklahoma Blind Cord Attorneys
Oregon Blind Cord Attorneys
Pennsylvania Blind Cord Attorneys
Rhode Island Blind Cord Attorneys
South Carolina Blind Cord Attorneys
South Dakota Blind Cord Attorneys
Tennessee Blind Cord Attorneys
Texas Blind Cord Attorneys
Utah Blind Cord Attorneys
Vermont Blind Cord Attorneys
Virginia Blind Cord Attorneys
Washington Blind Cord Attorneys
West Virginia Blind Cord Attorneys
Wisconsin Blind Cord Attorneys
Wyoming Blind Cord Attorneys

Atlanta, GA Blind Cord Lawyers
Austin, TX Blind Cord Lawyers
Baltimore, MD Blind Cord Lawyers
Birmingham, AL Blind Cord Lawyers
Boston, MA Blind Cord Lawyers
Buffalo, NY Blind Cord Lawyers
Charlotte, NC Blind Cord Lawyers
Chicago, IL Blind Cord Lawyers
Cincinnati, OH Blind Cord Lawyers
Cleveland, OH Blind Cord Lawyers
Columbus, OH Blind Cord Lawyers
Dallas, TX Blind Cord Lawyers
Denver, CO Blind Cord Lawyers
Detroit, MI Blind Cord Lawyers
Fresno, CA Blind Cord Lawyers
Hartford, CT Blind Cord Lawyers
Honolulu, HI Blind Cord Lawyers
Houston, TX Blind Cord Lawyers
Indianapolis, IN Blind Cord Lawyers
Jacksonville, FL Blind Cord Lawyers
Kansas City, MO Blind Cord Lawyers
Las Vegas, NV Blind Cord Lawyers
Los Angeles, CA Blind Cord Lawyers
Louisville, KY Blind Cord Lawyers
Memphis, TN Blind Cord Lawyers
Miami, FL Blind Cord Lawyers
Milwaukee, WI Blind Cord Lawyers
Minneapolis, MN Blind Cord Lawyers
Nashville, TN Blind Cord Lawyers
New Orleans, LA Blind Cord Lawyers
New York, NY Blind Cord Lawyers
Oklahoma City, OK Blind Cord Lawyers
Orlando, FL Blind Cord Lawyers
Philadelphia, PA Blind Cord Lawyers
Phoenix, AZ Blind Cord Lawyers
Pittsburgh, PA Blind Cord Lawyers
Portland, OR Blind Cord Lawyers
Providence, RI Blind Cord Lawyers
Raleigh, NC Blind Cord Lawyers
Richmond, VA Blind Cord Lawyers
Riverside, CA Blind Cord Lawyers
Rochester, NY Blind Cord Lawyers
Sacramento, CA Blind Cord Lawyers
Salt Lake City, UT Blind Cord Lawyers
San Antonio, TX Blind Cord Lawyers
San Diego, CA Blind Cord Lawyers
San Francisco, CA Blind Cord Lawyers
San Jose, CA Blind Cord Lawyers
Seattle, WA Blind Cord Lawyers
St. Louis, MO Blind Cord Lawyers
Tampa, FL Blind Cord Lawyers
Tucson, AZ Blind Cord Lawyers
Tulsa, OK Blind Cord Lawyers
Virginia Beach, VA Blind Cord Lawyers
Washington, DC Blind Cord Lawyers

Call 1-866-828-4699

Have you or a loved one experienced the death of a child due to one of the multiple hazards of window blinds or other corded window covering product?

Where were the blinds/window coverings purchased?

Type of Claim:
     

First Name*
Last Name*
Address
City
State
Zip
Phone*
E-mail*
*Required - Phone OR E-mail
Tell us about your case:
The Onder Law Firm welcomes contacts to our law firm through this Web site and will respond as quickly as possible. Please understand that The Onder Law Firm cannot represent you until we have thoroughly reviewed your case and determined we can be of help to you. The Onder Law Firm looks forward to receiving your contact information and working with you to quickly address your legal needs.
The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.
Experience Matters
The Onder Law Firm's window blind cord lawyers have handled or consulted on window blind cord strangulation lawsuits in more than 30 states:
We are the only law firm in the country that regularly handles window blind cord injury & death lawsuits. Our window blind lawyers are currently handling or have handled window blind cord strangulation lawsuits against the following window blind manufacturers & retailers:
Window Blind Manfacturers:
All Strong Industries
Bali
Beautiful Windows
Ching Feng Blinds Industries
Custom Craft
Hunter Douglas
Jencraft
Jumbo Surplus
Levelor/Kirsch
Lewis Hyman
Long Far Ind. Co.
Lotus & Windoware
Main Fine
Marietta Drapery & Window Coverings Co., Inc.
Newell Rubbermaid
Nien Made Enterprises
Richfield Window Coverings
Springs Window Fashions
Whole Space
Wilmar

Retailers/Distributors:
3 Day Blinds
Ace Hardware
Big Lots
Family Dollar
Handy Andy
Home Depot
IKEA USA
J.C. Penny
JustBlinds.com
K-Mart
Lowe's
May Department Stores
Menards
Montgomery Ward
Pier 1
Sears
ShopKo
Super Dollar
Target, Inc.
Wal-Mart

PETITION TO UNITED STATES CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

In re:  16 CFR § 1051 Petition for Rulemaking
Eliminating Accessible Cords
On Window Covering Products

Petitioners:

Parents for Window Blind Safety
Consumer Federation of America
Consumers Union
Kids in Danger, Public Citizen
U.S. PIRG
Independent Safety Consulting
Safety Behavior Analysis, Inc.
Onder, Shelton, O'Leary & Peterson,

PETITION FOR RULEMAKING

Petitioners, Parents for Window Blind Safety, Consumer Federation of America, Consumers Union, Kids in Danger, Public Citizen, U.S. PIRG, Independent Safety Consulting, Safety Behavior Analysis, Inc., and Onder, Shelton, O'Leary & Peterson, LLC (hereinafter "Petitioners"), pursuant to 16 CFR § 1051 state to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission as follows:

INTRODUCTION

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (hereinafter "CPSC") has long recognized window covering cords as a hidden strangulation and asphyxiation hazard to children and today continues to include it as one of the top five hidden hazards in the home. (CPSC, 2007, CPSC 2013a) Since 1985, the CPSC has worked with and repeatedly pressed the window covering industry (hereinafter "Industry") to eliminate these hazards, through public education, multiple corrective actions, and the voluntary standards development process.  Despite these efforts, the voluntary standard (first passed in 1996 and most recently revised in 2012) remains inadequate and continues to permit window coverings with hazardous accessible cords that injure and kill young children.

The unresolved issue of window covering cord injuries and deaths is not limited to the United States.  Indeed, global frustration over this on-going hazard resulted in the June

15, 2010 joint action by the CPSC, Health Canada and the European Commission wherein they joined together "in agreement on the need for immediate action," and made a trilateral request to the Industry for "support [of] a swift and comprehensive process that concurrently eliminates the risk factors causing deaths and injuries from all types of corded window covering products." (CPSC, HC, DG SANCO, 2010)

Acting upon the trilateral request, the Window Covering Manufacturers Association (hereinafter "WCMA") undertook a fifth revision of the voluntary standard, ANSI/WCMA A100.1 American National Standard for Safety of Corded Window Covering Products.

When it appeared that the renewed standards writing efforts were not satisfactorily addressing the major hazards responsible for injury and death, CPSC Chair Inez Tenenbaum wrote to the Industry on June 1, 2011, re-invoking the international call for a standard that eliminates window covering hazards, and stating, "I reaffirm to you my call for a comprehensive revised voluntary standard that eliminates – not just reduces – the strangulation risks from window coverings." (CPSC, 2011a) Ultimately, the inadequacy of the voluntary standards process, as well as the inadequate result toward which it was clearly heading, led consumer organizations reluctantly to take the unusual step of walking out of the process.  (CFA 2011)

Indeed, the call for a standard that would finally eliminate window covering hazards was disregarded.  The voluntary ANSI standards development process failed again, when the fifth revision of the ANSI/WCMA A100.1 standard was approved in late 2012 with critical inadequacies.  As will be shown below, 28 years after the CPSC first began working with Industry to address these hazards, the latest version of the standard still does not eliminate the major hazards that have caused approximately 40 percent of the deaths and injuries that have occurred since 1996.  In fact, the new standard allows for increasing numbers of hazardous accessible cords to be loaded onto new window coverings.  If the ANSI/WCMA A100.1 voluntary standard is allowed to stand as the de facto industry safety standard, children will continue to strangle and asphyxiate on unsafe corded window covering products.

Due to Industry's failure to develop a standard that adequately mitigates the risk of strangulation on corded window coverings, the Petitioners hereby formally Petition for Rulemaking under the authority and process set forth in 16 CFR § 1051, et seq. and request the Commission to promulgate a mandatory standard that prohibits any window covering cords where a feasible cordless alternative exists, and for those instances where a feasible cordless alternative does not exist, requires that all cords be made inaccessible through the use of passive guarding devices.

HISTORY:
THE FAILURE OF THE VOLUNTARY STANDARDS PROCESS

1985 Safety Alert

Following the reporting of 41 deaths on window covering cords between 1973 and 1980 and an additional report of another 35 deaths between 1981 and 1984, the CPSC approached Industry requesting its cooperative effort in issuing a joint Safety Alert. (CPSC, 1985a) CPSC staff met with representatives of Industry on September 13, 1985 and presented a proposed Safety Alert that made several recommendations including the cutting of cord loops. (CPSC,
1985b)

A joint Safety Alert was issued on December 20, 1985, but the recommendation to cut cord loops was not included.  In fact, Industry did not accept the recommendation to cut cord loops for another nine years.  The recommendations that were incorporated into the 1985 Safety Alert were: 1) Keep cords out of the reach of children and utilize safety devices such as cord cleats; 2) Adjust cords to the shortest possible length for the application; and 3) Do not place cribs or other furniture near windows, for furniture gives children added height to reach cords. (CPSC, 1985c)

A year after the 1985 Safety Alert was issued, the WCMA created camera-ready warnings incorporating some of these safety recommendations and made them available for use by manufacturers as bottom rail labels, hang tags and warning sheets. (DWC, 1988)  These warnings were used from 1986 until the adoption of the first voluntary standard in 1996, ANSI/WCMA A100.1- 1996.

CONTINUE READING THE FULL 39-PAGE PETITION IN PDF FORMAT


If you or a loved one has suffered from the trauma over the loss of a child as a result of a corded window covering, fill out our online form or call us toll free at 1-866-828-4699.


For more information contact the Onder Law Firm.

Onder, Shelton, O’Leary & Peterson, LLC
1-866-828-4699
www.onderlaw.com


Web Site Design by Gudeman Group